In a recent post on Digital B2B Marketing by Eric Wittlake, he
posed the opinion that Social Media was causing people to share lower quality
content as a result of trying to meet the demand for a higher quantity of
posts. At first I agreed with Mr. Wittlake, but as I toyed with the concept in
my head I began to question the theory.
It seems that with the increased visibility and reach provided
by social media that allows one user to have their content be viewed by untold
amounts of people that they might think twice about the quality of what they
are sharing. It is true that I am sure there are people out there, even me I am
sure, who occasionally share a peace of content that doesn’t quite meet par,
but to say that social media is lowering the quality of content all together is
crazy.
There is too much high quality content to say that the
standard has been lowered. Experts like Kyle Lacy, Doug Karr, Pete Cashmore,
even Eric Wittlake and many many more share high quality content every day and
I am not talking about sharing one of their personal blogs a day I mean sharing
eight different articles from eight different blogs ALL of the highest quality.
This is what causes me to believe social media is not lowering content quality.
No, instead social media is just
allowing lower quality content to be seen.
If you think that silly jokers weren’t trying to get crappy
content published prior to social media then you are a silly joker yourself.
They were mailing the crap to their family, friends, and publishers all trying
to get someone to read them, but their stuff was not being shared to the masses
because there was not efficient means of doing so.
So… to sum up I don’t agree that the quality of content is
lowering, not even a little. What I do think is that most of quality of content
being shared is rising, but social media is allowing content of poorer quality
to be made visible and if a few crappy blog posts are the cost of all the
benefits, well… I am willing to pay it.
No comments:
Post a Comment